Illustration + Design

blog

Two (Relatively Insignificant) Doors
Today I have told myself that I have to make a choice about what I am doing next semester.

Currently, I am enrolled in a BA at two different universities. I need to decide to do either:

- Uni by distance/correspondence for a semester with UTAS, where my choices of courses are more limited, but I would have more time off and self directed learning.

VS

- Going back to Newcastle and doing the subjects I've already enrolled in.

My results from last semester weren't glorious, considering I didn't submit the final essay for my favourite subject and failed that class, and only got credits in my other two subjects, for the most part I hated going to uni (though I enjoyed the classes) and it made me anxious, and I don't want to waste time and money doing subjects that I'm not enjoying or interested in and might fail. I know I have a lot of time on my hands to find what I want to be doing, and that is bound to change several times before I end up anywhere permanent, but I hate wasting time and I know I'll look back on this period and wish I'd just got my shit together and done what I wanted to.

I have to check that my Equity Scholarship can be transferred should I choose UTAS. Both the websites are open in tabs and I can easily defer for a semester from Newcastle in a couple of clicks, and in two days I can enroll in my UTAS subjects, or I can defer or reject my offer from UTAS and I don't have to do anything else. The UTAS semester has already started, so I'd have a bit to catch up on.

Basically, when I think about what I'd really like to be doing, it revolves around the internet, graphic and webdesign and some art, and later in life some teaching.

I know this is awfully boring and irrelevent to you, but it's causing me some worry and it's kind of good to get it down.

I feel like the best thing is to try new things, and distance may be interesting or more difficult, or hard to be bothered doing, but I might be an interesting move from what I've been doing previously.
Bloody
So, I've given up on True Blood. I gave it 7 episodes and it should have been good by now.

I welcome anyone who would like to help me win back any respect for it, but in essence, I found it to be overdone, over-acted and over-sexed with seemingly little underlying plot, characters neither likable, believable or evoking any empathy and overly-literal, weak dialogue. Teemed with some awful violent sex scenes, stereotypical one-dimensional characatures (sassy black waitress; gay black chef; brooding, lonely vampire; shallow, ditsy, sexed-up females) and some of the worst fake accents I've ever heard (3 of the main characters are from New Zealand, the UK and Australia, respectively, and none of the actors in the show are actually from the South, leading the way for some really unconvincing gargly Southern Accents), I had a really hard time making it through seven episodes. I wanted to see it out, finish the season, but I just had so little time for something I found to be so lacking in any depth.

It felt like a bad soap opera lined with some pop vampire lore, depicting women as weak, meek, sexual objects that need taking care of. I thought plot advancement and character development were pretty important aspects in a tv show, but turns out I was mistaken. This show takes itself really seriously. When it comes to vampires, it's a bit like, do it seriously and do it well, or ham it up and make it fun. How can the follow-up creation by somebody who made a series like Six Feet Under be so disappointing?

If anyone reading this watches this show and saw something in it that I didn't could you let me know? Have I missed something? I wanted to like it. I tried. I feel like I may be being too harsh, but I can't see anything in it. What is there to like about this show? Should I brave through those next five episodes?

It puzzles me that this show has such high ratings and such a massive viewership despite it's shortcomings. I guess as is the case of U2 ('U2 has been dubbed "The World's Biggest Band," which means the group has serious flaws. Most people are idiots, so if millions of them like your music, you're probably doing something wrong') the fact that this show is so popular doesn't necessarily mean that it's real good.

I feel that I may be being offensive with my open distaste for this show, but I am truly interested and waiting for somebody to explain to me what they liked about it. Anyone?

True Blood; 1 out of 5 stars.